Major theories of Motivation to increase
Productivity
Definition for Motivation
Employee motivation, i.e. methods for motivating
employees,
is an intrinsic and internal drive to put forth the necessary effort and action
towards work-related activities. It has been broadly defined as the
"psychological forces that determine the direction of a person's behavior
in an organization, a person's level of effort and a
person's level of persistence".
Also, "Motivation can be thought
of as the willingness to expend energy to achieve a goal or a reward.
Motivation at work has been defined as
'the sum of the processes that influence the arousal, direction, and
maintenance of behaviors relevant to work settings'." Motivated employees
are essential to the success of an organization as motivated employees are
generally more productive at the work place.
The Psychological
Theories of Motivation
1. Hertzberg’s Two-Factor Theory
The Two-Factor Theory of motivation (otherwise known as dual-factor theory or
motivation-hygiene theory) was developed by psychologist Frederick Herzberg in
the 1950s.
·
Motivator
factors
These are factors that lead to satisfaction and motivate
employees to work harder. Examples might include enjoying your work, feeling
recognized and career progression.
·
Hygiene
factors
These
factors can lead to dissatisfaction and a lack of motivation if they are
absent.
Examples include salary, company
policies, benefits, relationships with managers and
Co-workers.
While
motivator factors increased employee satisfaction and motivation, the absence
of these factors didn’t necessarily cause dissatisfaction.
Likewise,
the presence of hygiene factors didn’t appear to increase satisfaction and
motivation but their absence caused an increase in dissatisfaction.
2. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
paper
“A Theory of Human Motivation”.
The theory is illustrated that, “
Individuals, most basic needs must be satisfied, before they become
motivated to achieve higher level need.”
The hierarchy is made up of 5
levels:
1. Physiological – these needs must be met in order
for a person to survive, such as food, water and shelter.
2. Safety – including personal and financial security and health and wellbeing.
3. Love/belonging – the need for friendships, relationships and family.
4. Esteem – the need to feel confident and be respected by others.
5. Self-actualisation – the desire to achieve everything you possibly can and become the most that you can be.
2. Safety – including personal and financial security and health and wellbeing.
3. Love/belonging – the need for friendships, relationships and family.
4. Esteem – the need to feel confident and be respected by others.
5. Self-actualisation – the desire to achieve everything you possibly can and become the most that you can be.
According to the hierarchy of
needs, you must be in good health, safe and secure with meaningful
relationships and confidence before you are able to be the most that you can
be.
3. Hawthorne effect
The Hawthorne Effect is named after a series of social
experiments on the influence of physical conditions on productivity at Western
Electric’s factory at Hawthorne, Chicago in the 1920s and 30s.
The Hawthorne
effect (also referred to as the observer effect is a type
of reactivity in which
individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness
of being observed.
The researchers changed a number of physical conditions
over the course of the experiments including lighting, working hours and
breaks. In all cases, employee productivity increased when a change was made.
The researchers concluded that employees became motivated to work harder as a
response to the attention being paid to them, rather than the actual physical
changes themselves.
References
1.Blog.(2014): 5 Psychological Theories
of Motivation to Increase Productivity . Available at :https://contactzilla.com/blog/5-psychological-theories-motivation-increase-productivity
2."Hawthorne
Effect | What is Hawthorne Effect? - MBA Learner". MBA Learner. 2018-02-22.
Retrieved 2018-02-25.
3.Jones, Gareth R.;
George, Jennifer M. (2008). Contemporary Management.
4.Moran, Barbara B.
(2013). Library and Information Center Management. Santa Barbara, CA:
Libraries Unlimited.
5.Monahan,
Torin; Fisher, Jill A. (June 1, 2010). "Benefits
of 'Observer Effects': Lessons from the Field". U.S. National Library
of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
6.McCarney R, Warner J,
Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P (2007). "The Hawthorne Effect: a
randomised, controlled trial"


According to you what is the best theory ?
ReplyDelete